<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intranets: defining IA and UX in the Enterprise-wide Information System (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/intranets-defining-ia-and-ux-in-the-enterprise-wide-information-system-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/intranets-defining-ia-and-ux-in-the-enterprise-wide-information-system-part-1/</link>
	<description>information architecture - knowledge creation - intranets - quality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Knowledge (Part 2) &#8211; an enterprise-wide methodology &#171; manIA</title>
		<link>http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/intranets-defining-ia-and-ux-in-the-enterprise-wide-information-system-part-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Knowledge (Part 2) &#8211; an enterprise-wide methodology &#171; manIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/?p=648#comment-383</guid>
		<description>[...] in many organizations as I think that it would be a good fit as detailed in my posts on the Enterprise-wide Information System. However, as you rarely get something for nothing in this world, extra resource must be made [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in many organizations as I think that it would be a good fit as detailed in my posts on the Enterprise-wide Information System. However, as you rarely get something for nothing in this world, extra resource must be made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Current state of enterprise-wide information system architecture «&#160;manIA &#171; Predicate LLC</title>
		<link>http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/intranets-defining-ia-and-ux-in-the-enterprise-wide-information-system-part-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Current state of enterprise-wide information system architecture «&#160;manIA &#171; Predicate LLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/?p=648#comment-268</guid>
		<description>[...] Current state of enterprise-wide information system architecture «&#160;manIA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Current state of enterprise-wide information system architecture «&#160;manIA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick c walsh</title>
		<link>http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/intranets-defining-ia-and-ux-in-the-enterprise-wide-information-system-part-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick c walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/?p=648#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Thom,
         Many thanks for your thoughtful comments. Performance systems are generally part of the management systems in many organisations. I was attempting to show that in intranets that do IA/UX (whether they know it or not) it is generally confined to the intranet and often only involves structuring the management systems, transactions and other explicit information.

I absolutely agree that people can have many hats on especially in intranets where resource is usually cut to the bone. Part of what I was trying to do was show that the information system should be considered and governed as one thing which, in many cases, might give intranet and other enterprise information workers a different perspective on what they do. 
Look forward to your comments on Part 2 (when I get it written!)

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thom,<br />
         Many thanks for your thoughtful comments. Performance systems are generally part of the management systems in many organisations. I was attempting to show that in intranets that do IA/UX (whether they know it or not) it is generally confined to the intranet and often only involves structuring the management systems, transactions and other explicit information.</p>
<p>I absolutely agree that people can have many hats on especially in intranets where resource is usually cut to the bone. Part of what I was trying to do was show that the information system should be considered and governed as one thing which, in many cases, might give intranet and other enterprise information workers a different perspective on what they do.<br />
Look forward to your comments on Part 2 (when I get it written!)</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thom haller</title>
		<link>http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/intranets-defining-ia-and-ux-in-the-enterprise-wide-information-system-part-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>thom haller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/?p=648#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Nice envisioning/visualizing Enterprise-wide information systems.

Some thoughts:
You have IA/UX roles floating in the middle of the EIS. That tells a different story.  Story one: here is the system. Story two: here is IA/UX role in the system.  

If you tell story two you&#039;ll often find the same people working jobs for both systems.

I also wonder where performance systems fit in. Sometimes the IA/UX person works on a systematic solution directed at helping employees get their jobs done.  This is not typical &quot;Intranet&quot; content and is not supported by typical Intranet structure.

Just some thoughts.
th</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice envisioning/visualizing Enterprise-wide information systems.</p>
<p>Some thoughts:<br />
You have IA/UX roles floating in the middle of the EIS. That tells a different story.  Story one: here is the system. Story two: here is IA/UX role in the system.  </p>
<p>If you tell story two you&#8217;ll often find the same people working jobs for both systems.</p>
<p>I also wonder where performance systems fit in. Sometimes the IA/UX person works on a systematic solution directed at helping employees get their jobs done.  This is not typical &#8220;Intranet&#8221; content and is not supported by typical Intranet structure.</p>
<p>Just some thoughts.<br />
th</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise Information Systems and Definitions &#124; MarkSimon.de</title>
		<link>http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/intranets-defining-ia-and-ux-in-the-enterprise-wide-information-system-part-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise Information Systems and Definitions &#124; MarkSimon.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patrickcwalsh.wordpress.com/?p=648#comment-227</guid>
		<description>[...] one has to define them first. Regarding Information Architecture and User Experience, this article tries to incorporate these topics in a unifying concept. It is thoughtful, written with insight, and only the first in an upcoming series, so you are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one has to define them first. Regarding Information Architecture and User Experience, this article tries to incorporate these topics in a unifying concept. It is thoughtful, written with insight, and only the first in an upcoming series, so you are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
